posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by tel [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by nfrankel [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by bcash [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
A massive project that aims to be at the core of every Linux system, a goal of systemd development is to funnel everyone on to their platform and break compatibility with other platforms, development kicked off by a US based tech corporation, and a primary developer (Poettering) wants to streamline Linux for mass adoption by taking away options from the end user. All of this in the middle of the NSA revelations that show US technology companies cannot be trusted. Can systemd be trusted to provide a secure system free of all spying and data collection? submitted by Gramatik [link] [2 comments]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by williamgbuckley [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by cryptoz [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by SecurityEng [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
I decided I'll join the Linux family since my computer is quite old now and I'm tired of Windows 7 being laggy. So I installed the newest Ubuntu 14.04 and am now trying to put the launcher to the bottom, no success so far. I've tried a bunch of tutorials, a bunch of commands through the terminal but nothing worked so far. I assume the stuff didn't work because it was for 11-13.XX versions. So is there a way to move the thing to the bottom on 14.04? submitted by 99hundred [link] [4 comments]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by pollodelamuerte [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by Jameshfisher [link] [10 comments]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by pyr3 [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by thetango [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
I know a lot of people use Linux on servers and use OS X as the desktop OS. I personally do. But is there anyone who switched his desktop OS to Linux? Why? submitted by felixding [link] [10 comments]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by 3G6A5W338E [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
My Dell inspiron headphone jack is all jacked up and only plays one channel if I hold the cable just right. I'm not finding where the stereo output is an easily replaceable part. Is it possible to configure Linux Mint or Ubuntu to redirect sound output to the input jack? submitted by cat_dev_null [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by yinyangero [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by philcrissman [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by philcrissman [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by agumonkey [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by Paddy3118 [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
Previously on /r/linux http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/2b62nk/routing_loop_and_nat_problem/ I managed to fix the problem of none of my host being able to be NATed by the the edge router by having the intermediate router NAT the hosts, because it did get NATed by the edge router. root@drakeglider:~# iptables -L -t nat Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination LOG all -- anywhere anywhere LOG level error SNAT all -- anywhere anywhere to:192.168.2.30 root@keep:~# iptables -L -t nat Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination DNAT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:2200 to:192.168.2.5:22 DNAT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:2201 to:192.168.2.6:22 Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination LOG all -- anywhere anywhere LOG level error SNAT all -- anywhere anywhere to:23.226.236.177 Is there a way to make it so it doesn't SNAT to 192.168.2.30 if a packet is going to the destination of 192.168.2.0/24? submitted by Oflameo [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by sareneeru95 [link] [4 comments]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by klogk [link] [comment]

Read More...
posted 2 days ago on reddit
submitted by ammlibera [link] [comment]

Read More...