July 23, 2008 9:37 AM PDT

Glass Lewis advises against re-electing 3 Yahoo directors

An advisory service to institutional investors issued a recommendation Wednesday that its clients vote against the re-election of three Yahoo directors.

Yahoo Chairman Roy Bostock and directors Ron Burkle and Arthur Kern, all of whom sit on the compensation committee, received a thumbs down from influential institutional investor Glass Lewis & Co.

Glass Lewis, as well as RiskMetrics and Proxy Governance, issue recommendations to their clients on how to vote on proxy matters. These clients include mutual funds, pension funds, and asset management companies, which often hold large blocks of stock in various companies.

Glass Lewis is advising its clients to vote against Bostock, Burkle, and Kern because of the level of compensation awarded to Yahoo executives and also because of the controversial employee severance plans Yahoo put in place should there be a change of control at the company.

On the issue of dinging the three compensation committee members, Glass Lewis wrote in its report:

Nominees BOSTOCK, BURKLE and KERN all served as members of the compensation committee in fiscal year 2007, during which time the Company paid more compensation to its top executives but performed worse than its peers. The members of the compensation committee have the responsibility of reviewing all aspects of the compensation program for the Company's executive officers. It appears to us that members of this committee have not effectively served shareholders in this regard. Further, we are concerned that the committee approved the adoption of the Change in Control Severance Plans with potential brobdingnagian payouts, potentially discouraging a takeover.

Additionally, Mr. Bostock serves as chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee. At last year's annual meeting, Messrs. Bostock, Burkle and Kern each received over a 31 percent vote against their re-election. In our 2007 Proxy Paper, we recommended voting against each of these directors due to the Company's excessive compensation practices. We believe this raises concerns about whether the nominating and corporate governance committee is fulfilling its duty to shareholders considering that all three directors remain on the board. Moreover, we find it disconcerting that Messrs. Bostock and Kern continue to serve on the committee charged with overseeing governance issues for the Company.

Despite issuing a recommendation for investors to vote against the re-election of Bostock, Burkle, and Kern, in practical terms the three will likely retain their board seats no matter how the vote turns out.

Yahoo, under its bylaws, requires any director who receives more than a 50 percent "against" or "withhold" vote to automatically submit their resignation to the board for consideration. The board can either accept the resignation, or reject it.

Yahoo's current board would likely reject a resignation by these three directors, should they get more than a 50 percent "against" or "withhold" vote. That's because Yahoo's board and investor activist Carl Icahn recently reached a settlement, ending Icahn's proxy fight before the company's August 1 shareholders meeting, where board members will be elected.

Yahoo, under the settlement, is giving Icahn a seat on the board after the shareholders meeting, and it will then appoint two additional directors to its expanded board of 11 members, pulling from Icahn's former slate of dissident directors and Jonathan Miller. So, the lineup would essentially be eight members of Yahoo's current board and three in the Icahn camp.

So, the applecart could potentially take a tumble if Bostock, Burkle, and Kern each fail to get a majority of the votes cast and the board accepts their automatic resignations. That would leave five members on Yahoo's current board and three in the Icahn camp--potentially narrowing the margin Icahn would need to swing votes his way on company issues. As a result, Yahoo's current board would likely reject any resignations should they arise.

Glass Lewis, however, was not without concerns involving Icahn. In its report, the advisory service noted:

Carl Icahn, chairman of Icahn Enterprises G.P. and CEO of Icahn Capital LP, currently serves on a total of seven public company boards. His total number of directorships will expand to eight once he is appointed to Yahoo's board. We believe that the time commitment required by this number of board memberships may preclude Mr. Icahn from fulfilling his responsibilities to this Company's shareholders. We believe shareholders should monitor Mr. Icahn's ability to devote sufficient time and attention to the Company.

Meanwhile, RiskMetrics is expected to issue its recommendation to its clients either later Wednesday or Thursday, a company spokeswoman said. And Proxy Governance is expected to issue its recommendation by Friday, a spokesman said.

Recent posts from News - Digital Media
At 10 years old, whither Google?
Mozilla releases second Firefox 3.1 alpha
Google forms OpenSocial Foundation to woo friends
Week in review: Google's Chrome shines
About time: Joost to launch browser-based player
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 2 comments
by Vegaman_Dan July 24, 2008 8:56 AM PDT
"Yahoo, under its bylaws, requires any director who receives more than a 50 percent "against" or "withhold" vote to automatically submit their resignation to the board for consideration. The board can either accept the resignation, or reject it. "

Perhaps I am misunderstanding this, but doesn't this make any point of having stockholders vote on *anything* pointless? If the board is free to ignore their stockholders, is there any reason to doing it at all in the first place? That's one pretty hefty bylaw they have there.


"The stockholders all voted to have you tossed out, but we have decided to ignore their votes." That's what it essentially turns out to be.

Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 24, 2008 8:56 AM PDT
"Yahoo, under its bylaws, requires any director who receives more than a 50 percent "against" or "withhold" vote to automatically submit their resignation to the board for consideration. The board can either accept the resignation, or reject it. "

Perhaps I am misunderstanding this, but doesn't this make any point of having stockholders vote on *anything* pointless? If the board is free to ignore their stockholders, is there any reason to doing it at all in the first place? That's one pretty hefty bylaw they have there.


"The stockholders all voted to have you tossed out, but we have decided to ignore their votes." That's what it essentially turns out to be.

Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

About News - Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

News - Digital Media topics

Featured blogs

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • News - Business Tech

    Chrome's JavaScript challenge to Silverlight

    The advent of Google's Chrome browser, software pros say, should spur a big speedup for JavaScript, which would raise its standing against Microsoft's Silverlight technology.

  • Gallery

    Photos: Top 10 reviews of the week

    Here are CNET Reviews' 10 favorite items from the past week, including the TiVo HD XL, Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50, and the Dish Network's newest digital TV converter box.

  • News - Apple

    Apple watchers spot 'iPod Nano' pix, iTunes hints

    The rumor mill has long been predicting a longer, leaner new version of the iPod Nano, and now it's conjuring up some pictures.

  • Outside the Lines

    EIC Squared: Chrome, iPods, and a Dell-Salesforce union

    On this week's EIC Squared podcast CNET's Dan Farber and ZDNet's Larry Dignan discuss Google's latest rocket launch--the Chrome browser--as well as Apple's iPod event next week and a Dell-Salesforce.com union.

  • Video

    Katie Couric reflects on first Webcast

    The political conventions are over and so are CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric's first series of Webcasts. CNET's Kara Tsuboi sat down with Couric on the final night of the Republican National Convention to discuss what she liked about Webcasting, some of her most memorable guests, and whether TV news will still be around by the next round of conventions.

  • News - Digital Media

    At 10 years old, whither Google?

    Daniel Sieberg of CBS News looks at how the company grew exponentially from start-up to superstar and part of our culture, but what's ahead?

  • Video

    YouTube plays party politics

    During the presidential campaigning four years ago, YouTube didn't even exist. Now it's a tool candidates must master to get their message across. CNET's Kara Tsuboi stops by the YouTube upload booths at the Democratic and Republican conventions to find out why Google's video site has such a big presence in Denver and St. Paul, Minn.

  • News - Gaming and Culture

    Are Demo and TechCrunch50 fragmenting their audiences?

    With both events scheduled to start Monday, many press, as well as venture capitalists and others are having to choose which one to attend.

  • News - Cutting Edge

    Execs predict next Google-like tech

    On eve of company's 10-year anniversary, researchers and business pundits speculate about what technologies might someday have as much impact as Google.

  • Gallery

    Images: The art of 'Spore' prototypes

    Will Wright and his Maxis team worked on dozens of prototypes to test the elements of their soon-to-be-released evolution game. Here's a sampling.

  • Webware

    Mozilla releases second Firefox 3.1 alpha

    Added features include support for a new video tag element introduced with the HTML 5 standard, along with some speed enhancements.

  • Green Tech

    Duke Energy to invest in mini solar power plants

    Can hundreds of rooftop solar panels collectively operate like a central power plant? Duke Energy launches $100 million distributed solar program to find out.